If you're getting the message but a colleague isn't, this most likely means that the listed fonts aren't present on your computer. What was 'normal', and was it on a different version of the software?ġ. Has something changed with your setup? You said old drawings used to appear normal. It will be the same thickness/weight no matter what zoom scale you are currently in, unless you make it have a weight. Their behavior, as far as how they are displayed on the monitor, is exactly the same as a line. Having super-thin lineweights on-screen when using shx fonts is totally normal, IF that lineweight is set to be very small OR if you aren't displaying lineweights in your drawing. TTF fonts are an everybody-else-in-the-world thing. If you're plotting to pdf, font substitution matters. Alternatively, if you're using stb, you can try just giving the text or its layer a different plot style that has a thicker line. Actually, first thing is to make sure your drawing is using the correct ctb file to begin with. Are you using ctb? Then look at the color-to-penwieght mapping in the ctb file. The other thing, also as Brad mentioned, has to do with how you plot. This unpacks to one simple thing: check the lineweight assigned to the text, or to the layer it's on. They can only be bolded, and that can only be done through the text editor. ttf fonts: shx fonts will absorb whatever lineweight you assign, whereas ttf fonts never get thicker no matter what lineweight they have. There are a couple of things that could be going on here.įirst, as Brad mentioned, be aware of the fundamental difference between.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |